Pancreatic Cancers to Patrick Swayze and Steve Jobs
Pancreatic Cancer to Patrick Swayze and Steve Jobs : Two Separate Outcomes?
Steve Jobs underwent a liver transplant few months ago for a pancreatic tumor. That tumor was a neuroendocrine tumor. It is rare and much more slowly growing and more benign. Swayze has intraductal papillary mucinous cancer. Patrick Swayze was diagnosed with it in January 2008. His cancer is classified as Stage IV. That means in it metastasized outside the pancreas to other major organs, like the liver. Five year prognosis is very poor for Swayze and he realizes that two years would be pretty good survival time. Jobs, on the other hand, has a good long term prognosis. He underwent a Whipple procedure and then a liver transplant. He did not need chemotherapy. Ten years or more survival is quite possible without a liver transplant with this disease. So Jobs should do very well.
The story Swayze gives is a classic presentation of the carcinoma of the pancreas. He noted pain in his midsection while celebrating the 2007 New Year’s Eve and drinking champagne. He quickly lost twenty pounds and had constant indigestion. He then observed jaundice in his eye whites. He knew something was wrong then and looked into it. After a thorough evaluation, the doctors confirmed cancer. It was Stage IV pancreatic cancer. It was reportedly inoperable. The prognosis then was for six month survival. He has gone one year.
He did undergo surgery for removal of part of his stomach and some tumor. Chemotherapy was used but he had some major, but common, side effects. Lately, he has undergone Cyberknife radiotherapy procedures. He was told by his doctors recently that the tumor has metastasized to his liver. Recent photographs of him show wasting with facial and neck thinning.
Steve Jobs on the other hand is doing well. He underwent a liver transplant in Tennessee two months ago. This week he returned to work. The controversy occurs because people can live for ten years with liver metastasis. They don’t necessarily need a transplant. He had a transplant so should have no disease left theoretically. The question arises as to the person who went without because of him. Was this really needed?? I don’t know. I just raise the question.
We see two different diseases with two very dissimilar prognoses. We have two tumors: one fairly benign and treatable; and the other aggressive and not amenable to therapy. You can watch and see the unfortunate outcomes for one and a good outcome for the other.

June 30th, 2009 at 8:20 am
THATS GREAT FOR MR. JOBS! I AM A PHYSICIAN,AND IF YOU HAVE
THE MEANS TO PAY FOR A LIVER YOU CAN GET ONE. YES SOME ONE NOT GET THAT LIVER WHO NEEDED ONE.IF THE OBAMA HEALTH PLAN
IS APPROVED, HEALTH CARE WILL BE CHANGED. THE WELL OFF WILL
GET THE HEALTH CARE THAY NEED. OTHERS WILL NOT. I ASK YOU
ALL TO STAND IN OPPOSITION TO THIS GOVERNMENT PLAN.
THANK YOU,
DR. JAMES HAWKINS