Strange News Stories

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Obama Healthcare Proposals

Obama Healthcare Proposals: Are you against it?

If you thought the dog and pony show put on by the troika made up of insurance companies, hospitals and doctors was going anywhere, I have beach front property in Arizona to show you. The May 11th demonstration put on by the Obama administration purported to save US consumers two trillion dollars in costs over the next decade. However, now the honeymoon is over. Not so, says the industry, hospitals and doctors.

In a New York Times article by Robert Pear, hospital executives agreed to slow the rate of growth of health care spending. But they did not agree to trim it by the 1.5% each year over the next decade as Obama expects. This is where the two trillion in savings would be obtained. The government says any drop in the average spending increase of 6.2% a year in health care costs, would help. We expect to spend 4.4 trillion on health care in 2018. The federal government also warned us recently of the pending insolvency of Medicare and Social Security systems. In each area, we need to make significant changes to eliminate deficits and provide a solid basis of funding.

Pear reports that not only are the members of the troika backing off some of the points of agreement, but it is unlikely the federal government will allow this to happen due to antitrust laws. To adjust prices at a top or bottom limit by a group of doctors, insurance companies and hospitals would be against the antitrust laws now on the books. History does not support the likelihood that the Justice Department will allow such things to happen. Nor have the courts supported it. Justice and the FTC are afraid that collusion and cooperation among the troika may help consumers by lowering prices but may also help empower them in negotiations. Uncle Sam stopped it before, but maybe this time it’s different.

Elsewhere, the conservative faction is beginning their TV campaign to fault the Obama health care agenda. Janet Adamy reports in the Wall Street Journal that several groups are starting to produce ads that campaign against the Democrats and Obama health care agenda. They will show British and Canadian patients and doctors in their productions excoriating UK and Canadian socialized medicine. A patient with a growing brain tumor is told to wait for her appointment which is six months away. Just the thing we Americans want in our system. They want Max Baucus’ to keep his promise that the solution to our healthcare troubles will be “a uniquely American solution.”

9 Responses to “Obama Healthcare Proposals”

JOHN JUANOPULOS Says:

OBAMAS PLAN IS NOT WHAT HE PROPOSED BEFORE HE BECAME PRESIDENT.IN HIS CAMPAIGN HE SAID OVER AND OVER STORIES ABOUT HIS MOTHER DYING FROM CANCER IN A HOPSITAL BED ARGUING WITH THE INSURANCE COMPANY ABOUT PAYING THE BILL.HE NOW REVESRSES EVERYTHING HE SAID,BY TRYING NOT TO HELP THE HEALTH INDUSTRY BUT HELP THE MILLIONERS AND USELESS TO SAY THAT CONGRESS HAS BEEN BORROWING MONEY ON SOCIAL SECURITY BY GIVING OUT IOU’S. COME ON PRESIDENT OBAMA GET IT RIGHT.STOP SAYING ONE THING AND DO ANOTHER.DO NOT MISSLEAD THE PEOPLE THAT ELLECTED YOU
THANK YOU

JOHN JUANOPULOS

George Says:

Dem. or Rep. the problem is the system that allows the fox to run the hen house.
Lawyers, doctors, insurance companies and hospitals spend millions of dollars on lobbyist to to ensure OUR elected officials act in there interests NOT OURS! If you want to change the medical industry asking our elected officials to do it is frankly a BIG JOKE. Why should bite the hand that feeds them. Until we reform the political system there will be NO CHANGE. Quite blaming the parties they are both corrupted.

Thomas R Yock Says:

I think all government employees have the best health care plan in America.I don’t understand why the federal government can’t open up the same or simalar plan to all americans and regulate the cost to americans.I’d allow all insurance providers to bid on the goverment contract.This would be one way to regulate the cost and still show a saving to the people.

bob kerschbaum Says:

screw the insurance companies — they are not in business to provide health care –they are in business to make $$$$ and do so by limiting choices , coverages .they invented previous conditions ,experimental , drug formularies – if you need anything beyond an asprin or a band-aid it aint covered — screw them —bob kerschbaum

boredwell Says:

Most Americans on limited incomes/without comprehensive health insurance KNOW that our care provider system will make you wait, too. Whether your brain tumor is growing or not! How do I know? I’ve got a 3cm brain tumor. With the onset of new symptoms in November,I managed to get a neurology appointment in March. The doc ordered an MRI which not happen until July. If the radiology report shows no change, I will not get a followup. If it does, I’m penciled-in for August, one month after the MRI. At the behest of insurers, most protocols are rationed to cut costs. When they are prescribed, your symptoms must fit a medical model checklist to warrant the expense. In healthcare it’s this is referred to as “effecting a positive outcome.” Meaning: if the doc orders say, an MRI, the expense must be justified by the high probability that the tumor has grown, changed, become cancerous etc. That negative is paradoxically the “positive outcome.” I really don’t mind waiting. And I’m not really complaining, either. Since I’m marginally insured, I have to play it as it lays.

AARON BENEZRA Says:

This article is informative only to the extent that it educates the reader in the grossest general terms about the dollar size of the healthcare expenditures of the nation and the legal conflict in seeking to control costs by setting an expenditure ceiling, which may conflict with anti-trust laws. Unless the article is meant to imply that ultimately there is no real difference between industry healthcare modeling v. Obama healthcare modeling, the reader is not informed by this article about the fundamentals of an Obama healthplan v. industry healthcare modeling. There is therefore no real knowledge base by which to weigh in for or against Obama healthcare proposals, unless one already has such a knowledge base prior to reading the article.

suzan Says:

If we can spend trillions on bailing out the crooks on Wall Street and a war that was unwarranted with a greed motive, we can certainly provide healthcare for everyone. Medicare works great. No reason we can’t all be in that system.

Richard Says:

When are Americans going to get it?

What we have is ‘Disease Care’, Barack ‘Teleprompter’ Obama now wants the government to control ‘Disease Care’.

True ‘Health Care’ means little bribe money for the government and a financial catastrophe for the ‘Evil Medical Industry’.

Money rules! The last thing that government and the ‘Evil Medical Industry’ are concerned with are a patient’s welfare.

Do you really think that they actually care about the children who suffer?

Sandra Says:

I believe in the health casre reform,I have lived in and visited countries with this system and it is much more beneficial to their citizens than here. Health care access should be the same for every american.The wealthier citizens like myself could always afford private hospitals and insurance. But too many of our brothers and sisters are dying because they cant afford to even go to the doctor.Education and health care should be equally accessible to every USA citizen.

Leave a Reply