Strange News Stories

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer kills 25,000 men each year. Will Brachytherapy reduce deaths?

Maybe you saw the reported botched prostate cancer therapy report in the news this weekend.  Prostate cancer kills 25,000 men each year.  Twenty per cent of the male population develops the cancer over their lifespan.  While very common, only 3% of those who get it actually die from the disease.  Brachytherapy is a new type of therapy in which radioactive implants are placed directly in the tumor field of the diseased prostate gland.  The radiation kills the nearby cancer cells.  It is generally very safe with few side effects.  Usually, the risk of anesthesia is the riskiest part of therapy.

Apparently, a doctor and surgical team in the Philadelphia VA hospital did not place the implants correctly and caused some severe problems.  Over six years, 92 of 116 procedures were incorrectly performed as reported by Walt Bogdanich in THE NEW YORK TIMES (June 21).

The radioactive seeds are placed n the gland with the use of an ultrasound images that are put together to produce a three dimensional representation of the gland by a computer.  The surgeon then places a needle into the gland and manually inserts the radioactive seed into place.  Hundreds of seeds can be used. You want the majority to be placed within the gland. The computer displays placement of the seeds.  If the surgeon decides they are in the right position, then the procedure is considered successfully completed. However, the seeds can be placed outside the gland near other tissue like the bladder or rectum.  This can cause radiation damage to the local tissue. One of the patients in the article suffered radiation injury to the anal canal. If not placed in the gland, the cancer is not treated properly and the procedure needs to be repeated.

It appears that peer review and other safety procedures failed in the hospital to detect these failed procedures.  The radiation dosing machine that measures the adequacy of the radiation therapy was broken.  Even so, the treatments were still done.  There also was inadequate peer review of the procedure.  The program opened in 2002 and was ended after these results become known.

The most frightening thing in this whole episode is that it may not have even been discovered if an order for seeds had not gone awry. A clerical error led to the problem’s discovery.  Lower dose seeds were incorrectly ordered and used for implantation.  The nuclear commission noticed this and asked the hospital to investigate.  What they found was that the seeds had been improperly placed in several cases. They looked at more cases and found more problems: 45 in all.  The program was stopped.  The nuclear commission concluded that many case had undertreated the prostate as seed had been placed in the wrong areas or some other non-prostate tissues had been overdosed by radiation. None of this was reported to proper officials. The cases mismanaged mounted.

A major system failure occurred here. The nuclear commission did not feel they were responsible to report this as they did not regulate medicine.  Peer review by doctors of the surgeon and his team also failed.   There is no excuse for this.  What do you think?

9 Responses to “Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer”

Jim Yoder Says:

i have not much good news on this treatment, i had my prostate robaticaly removed , no wories , many radiation fail in 5 years ,just my oponion

dave carey Says:

My father died from prostate cancer in 1999. He was a soil scientist and entomologist – too much of a thinker for hs own good. We advised removal, he flew off to Arizona for Brachytherapy. The doctors also tattooed his sides, belly and back with a blue dot for the radiation machine. In the end, within 6 months, his colon and intestines were so severely burnt from radiation, that 3 pints of blood would be transfused, and would flow out his rectum within hours. Platelets had no time to clot. In the end, he died from bleeding to death.

Too much radiation – be careful if you are considering this surgery…

Rick Carter Says:

I think one of the most promising cancer treatments to come out in the past decade is the proton therapy which has been pioneered by Loma Linda Hospital in southern CA. It is truly exciting. They can determine the exact depth of the radiation by selectively varying the energy of these protons. I think if this proton therapy is used in combination with endoscopic surgery techniques in order to get as close as possible to the tumor site, then this technique can be used to treat a wide variety of cancers including prostate cancer with very little collateral damage to surrounding tissues, and therefore little adverse side effects as well. Comments, anyone? – Rick Carter

Bob C. Says:

Is this a sample of the Government run healthcare that we can expect from Mr. Obama? Medicare, Medicaid and the VA all seem to have glaring problems.
Brachytherapy has probably been around for 10 years or more. I hardly would call that “new”. Men need to kick and scream and holler to get the attention & funding level that has been provided for women and breast cancer. May God bless the men who have been so incompetently mistreated.
I am personally glad that I declined brachytherapy in 2004 and opted for surgery.

Dave Corkum Says:

I had brachytherapy done three years ago. There were significant side effects (prostatitis (resulting in penis pain) and some difficulty in emptying my bladder) for a couple of months. However, these effects lessened and my PSA, after briefly spiking for a couple of months about a year after the procedure, went from 6.7 to 0.8 in the last year and a half. My prostate cancer was diagnosed by rising PSA and biopsies, which detected small and isolated cancerous areas confined to the prostate. I am now 67.

Ed Dulude Says:

It behoves the patient to do his homework (research) before committing to this procedure. Not only from the standpoint of this procedure being his best option, but also from the standpoint of the experience levels of both the physician(s) and the facility. I received brachtherapy in August 1998 and consider myself blessed to be cancer free – but I did a lot of research on the procedure, the physician and the clinic. Cancer patients should assume the role of “partner” in their treatment; and, as such, share a degree of responsibility in the outcome.

kathy Says:

Rick Carter, yes I understand NOW that it is the best. I say research, research and talk to others. Although we live near Loma Linda, we were not aware of proton options last year when brachytherapy and external radiation was done. He now has severe bowl issues and pain. He now will go have a colonoscopy to see what is happening.

Marilyn Says:

My husband was convinced that radiation seeds were the best for him. When surgeon & radiologist reported to me after surgery, I noted the “scared” look on radiologist’s face. Later we discovered that his anal area was burned to the point that he could no longer sit down. Within a year or so, he developed colorectal cancer and needed his rectum removed and an ostomy bag installed. It was so painful to watch him diminish. He passed away within a few months after that surgery due to many complications. Think hard about those seeds.

Bill Smythe Says:

I had Brachytherapy in Seattle Washington in July of 1989. Had over 100 paladium seeds implanted. Minimal damage was done. I was very satisfied. Back to work in 3 days. Never met anyone who had a prostatechtomy that wasn’t permanently damaged in some way. Its also false that prostatechtomy insures that the cancer will never return.

Leave a Reply